Salisbury Four-Cable Articulated Robot Hand
US 4,921,293Remote Tendon Actuation, Three-Axis Fingers, and Cable-Tension Feedback
How It Works: Step-by-Step Mechanical & Physical Breakdown
For the Figure 3 routing, the four cable tensions are T₁ through T₄ and the illustrated pulley radii are R₁ through R₃. Opposing T₂ and T₃ rotates the third joint; opposing T₁ and T₄ rotates the second. Pulling T₂ and T₃ together while T₁ and T₄ pay out turns the first joint one way; pulling T₁ and T₄ together turns it the other. The patent gives the source law directly: , , and . It also warns that a built hand may use four distinct radii. Strain-gauged palm structures measure each cable’s tension; no historic force, speed, stiffness, friction, or dimension values are printed, so the interactive model refuses to invent them.
Interactive Real-Time Physical Simulation
Drag to rotate · Pinch to zoom · Shared controls update the displayed modelDetailed Component Architecture
1Connected Three-Joint Digit
Axis 1 passes through pin 36 at the palm. Axis 2 passes through pin 43 and Axis 3 through pin 47. The source states that Axes 2 and 3 lie in one plane and Axis 1 lies in a perpendicular plane. It supplies no link lengths or joint-angle limits; the model therefore shows topology and normalized articulation rather than asserting a historic workspace.
2Four-Cable, Three-Torque Transmission
For the illustrated route, cable ends T₂ and T₃ wrap the tip idler and Axis-2 idler; T₁ and T₄ are the ends of one cable passing from Axis 1 around the Axis-2 drive pulley. The products are moments in newton-metres when tension is in newtons and radius in metres. The patent does not specify cable material, diameter, baseline pretension, or a backlash value.
3Palm-Mounted Cable-Tension Sensors
Figure 5 bends the cable over a central strut inside a deflecting member and places gauges between that strut and an exit opening. Figure 4 instead carries a cable pulley on a strain-gauged cantilever. The specification calls the measured strain a function of cable tension, but gives no calibration curve, range, accuracy, bandwidth, or friction compensation claim.
4Resilient Frictional Tip Covering
The preferred embodiment says the third joint may be covered in a resilient material and offers hard rubber only as an example. It names flexibility, compliability, firmness, durability, and frictional engagement as desired properties. It does not identify polyurethane, a tip radius, covering thickness, durometer, coefficient of friction, contact law, or a force-closure guarantee.
5Remote Actuator and External Wrist Routing
The embodiment bundles four sheathed cables per digit into protective sleeves and locates the drive package remotely, for example on the forearm. The source’s claimed benefit is reduced hand actuator mass and no required operative cable connection through wrist gimbals. The grant permits other remote locations and even unsheathed or unbundled cable variants.
Governing Equations & Engineering Principles
Figure 3 One-Digit Four-Tension / Three-Torque Map
Source-Bounded Robotic Cable TransmissionClaim 1Axis 1 Source Torque
T₂ and T₃ contribute with one sign, while T₁ and T₄ contribute through R₁ with the opposite sign.
These are the three equations printed for one digit beside Figure 3, not a generic force-closure or dynamic hand model. The physical hand routes twelve cable ends; the exhibit mirrors this representative four-tension pose across its three connected digit chains. The source does not supply a cable pretension, contact law, motor limit, link inertia, or stability result.
Historical Context: The grant makes its preferred cable route unusually inspectable by printing the signed torque contributions directly; it also states that other rigging may use four different radii.
Interactive Schematic Sheet (1)
Perspective view of the connected arm, two-axis wrist, palm, two fingers, opposing thumb, cable bundles, and remote actuator drive and control.
Select Any Numbered Pin
Click pins on the schematic or select from the list below to inspect historical specifications.
Why It Still Matters
The grant captures a still-central robot-hand tradeoff in unusually concrete form: dexterity at the tool increases the number of joints, but remote tendon actuation keeps motors and their inertia away from those joints. Its value here is not a claim that every later hand descends from it; it is a checkable worked architecture in which routing, sensing, torque equations, and the connected mechanical assembly can be read together.
Legal Claims Decoder (9 Numbered Claims)
The Historical Bottleneck
Why Prior Art Failed
- •Forearm actuators with bare cables required multiple wrist gimbals per cable, crowding the wrist and limiting finger count and motion.
- •Passive compliance devices and active small-motion stages still used grippers suited mainly to static grasping, leaving manipulation to the arm.
- •The cited Okada hand used 22 cables for 11 degrees of freedom, routed all of them through wrist gimbals, and required a specially designed arm and controller.
- •Seven frictionless contacts could immobilize many objects, but the patent notes that implementation was formidable and could not twist a surface of revolution against resistance.
- The patent offers hard rubber only as an example fingertip covering; it does not print a material grade or friction coefficient.
- The torque equations are tied to Figure 3’s routing and radii, and the inventors explicitly allow other pulley sizes and rigging.
- The interactive study exposes one digit’s four-tension vector and mirrors its normalized pose across all three digits for comparison; the physical hand has twelve separately routed cable ends.