Skip to content
8 results shown
103 Curated Patents
View Timeline →

Archaic Legal Glossary & Citations

“Letters Patent”14th–20th Century
19th-C Meaning:

Open public letters from a monarch or government (literae patentes) granting monopoly rights.

Modern Engineering Decoded:Issued USPTO utility or design patent publication.
Historical note: Contrasted with 'letters close' (private sealed royal correspondence).
“In testimony whereof”19th Century
19th-C Meaning:

Formal concluding legal formula affirming under oath the execution of the instrument.

Modern Engineering Decoded:Inventor and witness digital/physical signatures.
Historical note: Required two witness attestations in 19th-century USPTO filing procedure.
“Aeroplane”Early 20th Century (Wright era)
19th-C Meaning:

A flat or cambered lifting aerofoil surface supported dynamically by air pressure.

Modern Engineering Decoded:Wing / Airfoil lifting surface (later evolved to mean the entire motorized aircraft).
Historical note: The Wrights used 'aeroplane' to denote the individual fabric-covered wings.
“Undulating Current”19th Century (Bell era)
19th-C Meaning:

An electric current whose magnitude varies continuously and periodically without interruption.

Modern Engineering Decoded:Continuous analog AC or audio-frequency electrical waveform.
Historical note: Bell's central legal weapon against telegraph companies who relied on pulsed DC make-and-break circuits.
“Subdivision of the Electric Light”1870s–1880s (Edison era)
19th-C Meaning:

The problem of operating numerous small domestic lamps off a single electrical generator.

Modern Engineering Decoded:Parallel circuit wiring of high-resistance incandescent electrical loads.
Historical note: Pundits claimed it was physically impossible until Edison increased filament resistance to 100 ohms.
“Optically Anisotropic Solution”1960s (Kwolek era)
19th-C Meaning:

A liquid solution that exhibits direction-dependent refractive indices due to molecular alignment.

Modern Engineering Decoded:Liquid crystalline nematic phase polymer dope.
Historical note: Technicians initially tried to throw out Kwolek's cloudy solution thinking it was contaminated.
“Unitary Body of Semiconductor Material”1950s–1960s (Noyce era)
19th-C Meaning:

A single continuous crystal structure of silicon or germanium.

Modern Engineering Decoded:Monolithic single-crystal silicon die / integrated circuit wafer.
Historical note: Differentiated Noyce's monolithic planar circuit from Jack Kilby's hybrid flying-wire prototype.
“Peculiar and Novel Construction”19th Century
19th-C Meaning:

A distinctive, patentable structural arrangement not found in prior art.

Modern Engineering Decoded:Novel and non-obvious mechanical embodiment under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Historical note: Standard 19th-century legal terminology establishing novelty.
Classic Patents/US 3,119,501
Information Age & Silicon Revolution (1960–1990)Industrial Automation & Warehouse Control

Lemelson Marker-Addressed Automatic Warehouse

US 3,119,501

Rail travel, vertical positioning, bay transfer, and preset-count feedback

Inventor(s)Jerome H. Lemelson
Grant DateJanuary 28, 1964
Filing DateOctober 10, 1961
LocationMetuchen, New Jersey
Lemelson's 1964 continuation grant claims a self-propelled storage-and-retrieval carrier with a vertical guide, laterally extending article fixture, storage-bay markers, a scanning relay, and a preset counting relay that stops motion after a selected number of position events. The issued text ties the 1961 filing to a 1954 continuation application, so the museum treats the record as an early electromechanical warehouse-addressing system rather than a claim to all automated storage.
USPTO PDF
Engineering Analysis & Physical Principles

How It Works: Step-by-Step Mechanical & Physical Breakdown

The system is a coordinate-addressed material-handling machine. A self-propelled carrier moves along a first guide, an attached second guide moves a load fixture vertically, and the fixture reaches laterally into a selected storage bay. The more distinctive legal move is the feedback loop: source-described markers produce scanning signals, a preset relay counts them down, and the motor stops at a chosen position. The patent's architecture is physical rail, mast, bay, scanner, relay, and transfer fixture—not a generic right to warehouse software.
The Core Breakthrough Mechanism

The source assigns separate carrier motions to motors Mx, My, and Mz. In a normalized engineering reading, the selected bay is a pose q=(x,y,z)q=(x,y,z): rail position, vertical level, and lateral transfer. A scanner emits a position event as it sees a marker; the preset counter state can be written cnext=cnow−1c_{next}=c_{now}-1 per received event, with a motor-state transition when c=0c=0. The grant does not print a rail length, bay pitch, payload, motor power, sensor error, or cycle-time value, so the shared exhibit shows topology and state rather than fabricated SI performance figures.

Interactive Real-Time Physical Simulation

Drag to rotate · Pinch to zoom · Shared controls update the displayed model
INITIALIZING THREE.JS WEBGL SIMULATION...
Marker-Addressed Warehouse Topology.
Host-Model Telemetry/Computed Readout
Marker-Addressed Warehouse Topology
Rail Address
Normalized
55% normalized[1]
Vertical Address
Normalized
42% normalized[1]
Shuttle Extension
Normalized
32% normalized[1]
Addressing State
Source
BAY TRANSFERsource topology[1]
Quantitative Performance
Source Refusal
REFUSEDmissing source inputs[1]
Rail Address0.55 normalized
Vertical Address0.42 normalized
Shuttle Extension0.32 normalized
Preset-Count Addressing1 off/on

Detailed Component Architecture

1Track-travelling carrier and first guide
A self-propelled carriage travels horizontally beside the storage rack on the first guide means.

Claim 1 places the first carriage on a first guide substantially parallel to the accessible side of the rack. That establishes the rail-address coordinate xx, but the drawing and claims do not state a rail length, wheel diameter, motor torque, or speed. The visual therefore maps its rail control only to normalized position.

19th-C. Term: first guide meansModern: longitudinal guide rail / aisle axis
2Vertical guide and second conveying means
A second carriage moves vertically on a guide attached to the horizontal carrier, bringing the fixture to a selected level.

The patent's second guide provides a vertical coordinate zz after rail travel. The source describes a motor-driven carriage and fork arrangement, not a sourced payload chart, mast stiffness, brake rating, acceleration curve, or safe operating envelope.

19th-C. Term: second conveying meansModern: elevator carriage
3Laterally extending fixture
A laterally extending article holder transfers an item between the carrier and a rack bay.

The fixture supplies the transfer coordinate yy relative to the rack face. In the source sequence, horizontal travel and vertical positioning establish the bay address before the transfer motion proceeds. The patent gives the part relationship but not a measured stroke, contact force, or payload capacity.

19th-C. Term: laterally extending fixtureModern: shuttle fork / load-transfer carriage
4Marker scanner and preset counter
A scanner turns physical bay markers into event pulses; a preset counter uses their number to stop or sequence motor action.

The source describes photoelectric markers and a limit-switch alternative. The abstract control relation is cnext=cnow−1c_{next}=c_{now}-1 for each position event until c=0c=0. That is a discrete feedback mechanism, not a claim that the source supplies encoder resolution, latency, or fault-detection data.

19th-C. Term: predetermining counting relay meansModern: preset event counter with motor-stop logic
Engineering Principles & Equations

Governing Equations & Engineering Principles

Authored explanation paired with its stated mathematical relation

Preset-Count Marker Event Sequence

Industrial Automation & ControlClaim 1
Mathematical Governing Law
cnext=cnow−1;c=0⇒change motor state\htmlClass{eq-term eq-term-counter_c eq-term-cyan}{\htmlData{var=counter_c}{\textcolor{#0891b2}{c_{next}}}}=\htmlClass{eq-term eq-term-preset_n eq-term-sapphire}{\htmlData{var=preset_n}{\textcolor{#2563eb}{c_{now}}}}-\textcolor{#16a34a}{1}; \quad \htmlClass{eq-term eq-term-counter_c eq-term-cyan}{\htmlData{var=counter_c}{\textcolor{#0891b2}{c}}}=0 \Rightarrow \htmlClass{eq-term eq-term-trip_relay eq-term-crimson}{\htmlData{var=trip_relay}{\textcolor{#dc2626}{\text{change motor state}}}}
Terms:
Plain English DecoderHover or tap any highlighted phrase
The decrements from the with each until zero changes the .
cc
Remaining Down-Count
State variable of the source-described preset counting relay
Position events

The grant describes a counter that uncounts as the scanner sees identifiers, then changes control state at the selected count. It does not state a count frequency or event timing.

Live Physical Value:
BAY TRANSFER source topology
Physical Principle & Engineering Insight

The equation is a symbolic reading of the printed preset-count sequence. It intentionally omits numerical warehouse scale, payload, speed, motor, timing, and sensor-performance assumptions absent from the facsimile.

Historical Context: The issued claims show a physical warehouse address formed by guide travel, vertical movement, transfer, marker sensing, and a preset count; they do not justify a claim to all later automated storage systems.

Coordinate-addressed motionAuthored Principle 1
Stated relationq=(x,y,z)q=(x,y,z)
The carrier rail, vertical guide, and lateral fixture form three source-described motion directions. The equation labels their normalized positional relationship; it does not assign source-unsupported dimensions to the warehouse.
Discrete feedback countingAuthored Principle 2
Stated relationcnext=cnow−1c_{next}=c_{now}-1
Claims 1–5 require a preset counting relay or counter that receives marker-derived position signals and stops a drive after the selected count. This is an event-count relation, not a claim about clock time or sensor precision.
Motor-state sequenceAuthored Principle 3
Stated relationMx→cx=0Mz→cz=0MyMx \xrightarrow{c_x=0} Mz \xrightarrow{c_z=0} My
The specification describes counter-controlled sequencing among longitudinal, vertical, and transfer motions. The notation makes the claimed control topology legible while avoiding a fabricated production-rate or motion-profile model.

Interactive Schematic Sheet (Fig. 1)

Figure 1 shows the source system's carrier, track, racking, lift, and fork relationships.

1.00x
US 3,119,501 · FIG. 1
Tap any numbered pin4 Curated Callouts
Callout Pin Inspector

Select Any Numbered Pin

Click pins on the schematic or select from the list below to inspect historical specifications.

Why It Still Matters

The patent is a remarkably concrete bridge between warehouse geometry and discrete control: a selected location is reached by rails, lift, shuttle, marker, scan, count, and stop operations. In 1973, the Second Circuit's account of the related Triax system described automatic stackers used in warehouses and analyzed precisely those rail, elevator, shuttle, and marker-control differences. That makes this a useful historical exhibit for understanding why automated storage is a coupled mechanical-and-feedback problem, even though the 1964 grant is not a blanket claim to modern warehouse automation.

Legal Claims Decoder (6 Numbered Claims)

Compare dense legalistic claims directly with decoded plain-English functional specifications.
Claim #1Independent Master Claim
1/6
Verbatim Historical Legal Text
“Automatic conveying apparatus comprising in combination (a) a first guide means, (b) a self propelled conveyor including a conveying means in the form of a carriage with means mounted thereon for driving said carriage along said first guide means, (c) said carriage having a second guide means mounted thereon and extending in a generally vertical direction, (d) a second conveying means mounted for movement vertically along said second guide means, (e) a servo drive means mounted on said conveyor for power driving the carriage horizontally along the first guide means and driving said second conveying means vertically relative to said second guide means, (f) said second conveying means including a laterally extending fixture for holding an article thereon, (g) a storage rack having a plurality of storage bays, (h) said first guide means extending substantially parallel to a side of the storage rack which is accessible to the second conveying means, (i) means on the storage rack for identifying the relative positions of said bays, (j) control apparatus for controlling the operation of said servo drive means for positioning said second conveying means at a predetermined position along said first guide means and at a predetermined vertical position relative to said second guide means, (k) a scanning relay means mounted on said self propelled conveyor for scanning said identifying means, (l) said identifying means including a plurality of markers in the scanning path of said scanning relay means, (m) said scanning relay means generating signals for transmission to said control apparatus each time said scanning relay means scans those markers which are in the scanning path said conveyor is moved, (n) said control apparatus including a predetermining counting relay means in circuit with said servo drive means for said carriage said counting means serving to stop said servo drive means upon receipt of a predetermined number of position indicating signals generated by said scanning relay means as said carriage moves along said first guide means.”
Plain English Engineering Translation
Claim 1 is the broadest issued warehouse machine claim: a self-propelled rail carriage, vertical second guide, laterally extending article holder, storage rack, bay identifiers, scanning relay, and preset counter that stops motion after selected position signals. Its legal work is the physical-and-control combination, not any isolated rail, fork, relay, or generic inventory-location concept.
Key Protected Innovations:
Self-propelled guide-rail carrierVertical second guideLateral article fixtureMarker-scanning relayPreset counting relay
Historical Legal Impact:
The Second Circuit later treated the rail, elevator, lateral fixture, rack markers, and count-controlled stopping features as the claim-specific structure when assessing infringement.

The Historical Bottleneck

The specification identifies the logistical difficulty of moving work-in-process and finished goods to and from selected bays without continuously directing stacker cranes or relying on single-level conveyor storage.

Why Prior Art Failed

  • •The source says earlier equipment for palletized or boxed goods required manual direction or manual remote control.
  • •It describes conventional stacker cranes as requiring attendance by an operator.
  • •It identifies a closed-loop belt-conveyor arrangement as limited to a particular section and substantially a single storage level.
The Breakthrough Insight
“Treat a warehouse location as a physical address reached by serial rail, lift, and transfer motion, with marker-derived events counted down by preset relays. The resulting system connects rack geometry, sensing, and motor state instead of treating storage and control as separate problems.”

Patent Wars & Legal Litigations

Vs. The Triax Company v. Hartman Metal Fabricators, Inc.Infringement Challenge
Rival Claim & Defense:
Triax asserted the Lemelson warehouse patent against Hartman's stacker under the doctrine of equivalents.
Litigation Conflict:
The Second Circuit compared the claimed laterally extending fixture, sequential rail-and-elevator movement, rack markers, and preset-count logic with Hartman's retractable bidirectional extractor, simultaneous motion, and different sensing/control arrangement.
Final Resolution & Judicial Outcome:
In 1973 the Second Circuit affirmed judgment for Hartman on the Lemelson claim while preserving validity of the Lemelson patent.
After the Grant
The 1973 Triax litigation provides unusually direct evidence that the claimed kind of automatic stacker system was being manufactured, sold, and installed in warehouses. It also makes the boundary of the claim visible: different geometry and sensing/control choices could avoid infringement.
Civilizational Impact
The grant records an early, concrete treatment of automated storage as a coupled mechanical-and-feedback system. Its significance is not that it owns all later warehouse automation, but that it makes a selected bay legible as a rail, lift, shuttle, marker, scanner, counter, and stop sequence.
Further Context
  • The printed grant says six claims; the edition includes all six, including the dependent limit-switch alternative.
  • The official text calls the 1961 application a continuation of a July 1954 application; the court later accepted the earlier filing date for patentability analysis.
  • The visual uses only normalized geometry because the facsimile does not state warehouse dimensions, payload, travel speed, motor power, or sensor precision.